Paul’s story is not uncommon. I have heard it dozens of times since I came
out last year in support and advocacy of our LGBT sisters and brothers. Paul did not choose to be gay. In fact, he did everything that his church
leaders counseled him to do including getting married. He was told that getting married along with
prayer and fasting, would take care of “the problem”. Finding that marriage and “praying the gay
away” did not turn him straight, Paul eventually had the heartbreaking talk
that no spouse wants to hear. His wife
was understandably upset, shocked, and shaken.
She too had been conditioned to believe that these “tendencies” were a
matter of will power and choice and could be simply corrected through referrals
by leaders to marriage and family relations classes and “reparative
therapy”. As is most often the case, the
result did not meet expectations and she blamed Paul for his inability to
become heterosexual. She began to
withdraw her support, believing that he simply wasn’t motivated enough to
change his sexual orientation. They
ended up divorcing and Paul began to be engulfed in feelings of self-hatred and
self-loathing. Feeling abandoned and
increasingly isolated, depression escalated to the brink of Paul having
suicidal thoughts and planning to take his own life. Such is the case with many of our loved ones,
friends, and neighbors who are LGBT.
Tragically many of them do end up taking their own lives. In fact, LGBT individuals who face rejection
from their families are shown to have significantly higher suicide rates. Many LDS mental health professionals, such as
myself, have come to realize that it is not the orientation of an individual
that can cause depression and suicide but more often it is the rejection of
family and community, as well as the homophobic rhetoric and actions of others
that push many LGBT individuals to the brink.
But now new information has recently become available that has and will
continue to radically change the therapeutic landscape.
A few weeks ago, Robert Spitzer, a prominent psychiatrist
and researcher who authored a controversial study in 2001, apologized to the
gay community. His 2001 study on
“reparative”, “conversion”, or so called “reorientation” models of therapy
supported the notion of Paul, his wife, and many local church leaders, that
LGBT individuals could indeed become straight through these models of
therapy. Although many researchers and
therapists thought the study was already on shaky methodological ground to
begin with, there were also many therapists, researchers, and authors on the
subject of homosexuality and mental health who referred to this study as the
definitive proof that such models were scientifically acceptable, ethical, and
competent. In many respects it was the
keystone study that most non-affirming models of therapy relied on. It turns out that Spitzer was wrong, his
study was flawed, and in an unprecedented mea culpa he withdrew his support for
his own study and has now apologized to the LGBT Community. The last thread of competent scientific
support for these models of therapy has been cut.
To be fair
to Spitzer, he is also notable for his bold efforts in 1973 to take
homosexuality out of the Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM) that mental health
professionals use to diagnosis mental health disorders. Spitzer should be credited for taking this
important step. However, many therapists
and counselors were still slow to embrace this change and continued to see
being LGBT as a mental health disorder that could be changed through counseling
or as an addiction that could be managed.
With Spitzer’s notoriety and credentials as someone who clearly was not
anti-gay, his 2001 study accelerated the use of “reparative” therapies. Books were written. Success stories were hailed. Money was made off of the hope for a supposed
cure or control for homosexuality.
Thankfully, Spitzer in the end did not want his legacy or his name tied
to this movement. Likewise, do we who
are LDS mental health professionals want to be tied to a legacy of unfounded,
non-evidence based models of treatment that are ineffective at best and at
worst destructive to the mental and emotional well-being of LGBT individuals
and their families?
In addition to Spitzer’s historic and monumental
announcement, another study by Renee Galliher, Ph. D., John Dehlin, M.S., and
Bill Bradshaw, Ph.D. has also come out showing empirical support that LGBT
Mormons typically do not benefit from reparative therapy and many of them have
in fact been harmed by those models. The
research is well worth reading and may be one of the first of its kind to
assess the efficacy of different treatment modalities with the LGBT Mormon
population. Preliminary results of that
study can be found here:
http://ldshomosexuality.com/wp-content/uploads/USU-LDS-SSA-Newsletter-v1.pdf
The Church Handbook of Instructions wisely advises
ecclesiastical leaders to encourage members not to “use medical or health
practices that are ethically or legally questionable” and instead encourage
members “to consult with competent professional practitioners who are
licensed . . .” (CHI 2010, 17.2.6, pg.
162). I can’t think of more ethically
questionable models of therapy than ones that attempt to change orientation and
are sometimes developed and run by unlicensed individuals. I believe it is up to us as LDS mental health
professionals to help educate the LDS Community to know what is helpful,
ethical, competent, safe, and evidence based practice in mental health
treatment for our friends and family members.
Promoting orientation as an “addiction” or telling individuals and
families that non-credible treatment models are effective should not continue.
I believe we need to turn our backs on these models, as well
as the equally ineffective or destructive view that somehow orientation itself
is an addiction. It is not unusual for
LGBT Mormons to be referred to church sponsored addiction recovery groups and
programs due to their orientation. Like
many other Mormon therapists have come to realize, I have found that there are
more affirming models that will promote the mental and emotional well being of
LGBT Mormons that are scientifically sound and also consistent with
Christ-Centered principles. I believe
that 20-30 years from now the practice of reparative therapy for LGBT
individuals will be viewed with ethical abhorrence in a similar way as we now
look back at the eugenics movements of the early and mid twentieth century.
Thankfully, more affirming and evidence-based models of care
for LGBT individuals and their families are being developed. One of the most promising is the Family
Acceptance Project developed by Dr. Caitlin Ryan and her colleagues. Their family support work is based on rigorous
research with LGBT youth, young adults and families. Their studies are
published in peer reviewed journals starting with the first study on family
rejection -- published in the distinguished journal Pediatrics in 2009 -- that
showed a clear link between parental and caregiver rejection of lesbian, gay
and bisexual youth with negative health outcomes such as drug use, depression,
and suicide and HIV risk in young adulthood.
Thus, to a greater extent than was previously understood, the critical
work that must be done is with the family and the community to help educate
them on interactions that will be supportive and affirming. For more information on The Family Acceptance
Project and Dr. Caitlin Ryan’s research, please visit: http://familyproject.sfsu.edu/.
Recognizing that spirituality can be one of many important
protective factors against suicidal ideation, Dr. Ryan has attuned her work and
research into being culturally sensitive to the religious and spiritual milieu
of LGBT individuals and their families.
Her work will soon generate the first evidence - based education
materials for LDS families with LGBT children followed by an education program
specifically targeted and customized to the needs of LGBT Mormons and their
families. It is expected that her
materials for Mormon families of LGBT individuals will start to be released in
July 2012.
Educating families and other crucial members of an LGBT
individuals’ support system may be one of our most important challenges and
opportunities as LDS mental health professionals. Families, school officials, community and
church leaders need to know what interactions are potentially harmful and what
interactions are helpful with our loved ones, students, and neighbors. Knowing this could be a matter of life and
death. Many LDS therapists have already
changed course and become more affirming of orientation in their practice. These pioneering Mormon therapists search for
safe pathways through a homophobic wilderness and a polarizing political,
cultural, and religious climate. LGBT
Mormons are particularly vulnerable. On
one hand they hear loud angry voices telling them to leave their “hate filled”
religion, and on the other hand religious, cultural, and political extremists
in the church continue to use the church to promote fear, long dispelled myths
about being gay, and even hateful words and actions towards LGBT Mormons. Dr. Ryan’s evidence – based, competent
research and compassionate family intervention approach will only bolster those
therapist’s conceptual models and effectiveness in helping their LGBT clients
navigate these challenges as well as the essential component of educating
family members how to become a safe and protective shield for their loved ones
against these angry voices.
Now more than ever before, competent, fair-minded, LDS
mental health professionals need to protect the emotional and mental health of
our LGBT clients and educate families, community, and church officials in the
LDS Community. I am confident that as
LDS therapists take these steps, not only will we be more competent and
effective in helping individuals such as Paul and his family members, but we
will also help save lives.